When looking at a disk some folks may think a server with 100 or 200 I/O per second is high. Talk to an EMC rep...
about DMX storage and they laugh at 200 I/O per second for an individual server. Then again, if you are running an MSA 500 as the backend for a virtual machine platform several 200 I/O per second virtual machines will start to show a performance hit. Again it's still relative, the hypervisor is only going to show limited overhead, but the hardware underneath has to handle it.
As to a comparison between the platforms, I am not aware of any outside bodies doing independent testing of the hypervisors, but there is a constant battle between the companies about who performs better, each with their own numbers. I'd say your best bet is to get a trial of any you are looking at, and pound it yourself.
Dig Deeper on Network virtualization
Related Q&A from Eric Siebert
Should a host server be used as a domain controller? Ron Oglesby offers his thoughts in this expert response.continue reading
Physical servers or virtual servers? Ron Oglesby shares his thoughts in this expert response.continue reading
Is VMware a better option for clustering than Microsoft Cluster Server or Veritas? Ron Oglesby has an opinion in this expert response.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.