Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware

Microsoft Virtual Server vs. VMware

Can you compare Microsoft Virtual Server and VMware? We're trying to decide which is a better virtualization product to use.

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register, my team of editors will also send you the latest expert resources covering all areas of server virtualization, such as platforms, architectures and strategies, server hardware, managing virtual environments, application issues and more.

    Cathleen A. Gagne, Senior Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchServerVirtualization.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchServerVirtualization.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

A comparison of the two could easily fill a whole article. Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 is available as a free download (although you obviously need to have paid for any licenses for the OSes to be run in it), as is VMWare Server. One big difference between the two appears to be ease of use: Virtual Server requires a little more work to get up and running and work with, while VMware is more wizard-driven and that much easier to get a handle on.

The other difference seems to be performance, but this is debatable. I have read a few newsgroup postings that seem to indicate that Virtual Server is slightly faster with regard to some I/O operations. Most people don't seem to be able to find any real difference between the two that would motivate them to switch from one to the other. (If you've used one or the other already, you will probably be inclined to stay where you are.)

This was first published in August 2006