Should I select servers with lights-out management hardware, or will third-party management tools work?
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Bigelow: As virtualization permeates the enterprise and consolidation levels increase, IT professionals increasingly rely on systems management tools to control physical servers, allocate resources to virtualized workloads, monitor workload performance, help with capacity planning and numerous other data center tasks. In many cases, lights-out management – a platform that gives IT professionals the ability to remotely monitor and manage servers – can help ease these administrative demands. This means new server purchases should include an evaluation of interoperability within existing systems management tools. Although tools should provide some level of interoperability, just how much interoperability they offer poses a serious concern.
The perennial challenge for systems management platforms is breadth versus depth. It is extremely difficult for any one systems management platform to provide detailed management insights and capabilities to every possible hardware device; the result is a wide breadth but narrow depth. Conversely, dedicated systems management tools, such as integrated Dell Remote Access Controller (iDRAC) or Hewlett Packard's Integrated Lights-Out (iLO), can often provide extremely detailed control, but only over a limited range of vendor platforms or product families. These tools offer narrow breadth but deep depth. Some management tools, combined with distributed agents, can strike a balance between breadth and depth, but these are usually complex and expensive third-party systems management frameworks.
Generally speaking, an organization that is already invested in lights-out management platforms (like iDRAC or iLO) will continue to select systems that are compatible with the current platform. If the business is using a systems management software tool or framework, it's important to test the prospective new server to verify that the current tool will provide adequate support for the new systems – otherwise the business may forego the purchase or select an alternate server that is more compatible with current management. It is rare to mix multiple lights-out management platforms because this poses a second management expense and learning curve for IT staff.
Selecting next-generation servers for virtualized data centers involves a combination of technical decision-making, a careful review of interoperability with management platforms, actual performance assessment through proof-of-concept testing and a healthy dose of solid business planning. But, every IT professional must remember that there is rarely one answer for server questions. In many situations, an organization can select several different servers during a technology refresh in order to ensure adequate resources for varied workload demands.
Dig Deeper on Server hardware and virtualization
Stephen J. Bigelow asks:
Which lights-out management platforms do you rely on?
0 ResponsesJoin the Discussion
Related Q&A from Stephen J. Bigelow
Not all hypervisors and OSes can play nice with others. The best method for avoiding complications down the road is to thoroughly test your nested ...continue reading
Theoretically, there is no limit on how 'deep' a nested VM can go. The best way to avoid any confusion is to appropriately label hypervisor nesting ...continue reading
Interested in giving nested virtualization a try in your data center? There are a few software and hardware requirements you'll have to meet first.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.