Access your Pro+ Content below.
Virtualizing SAP: For many shops, still the next frontier
This article is part of the August 2008, Vol. 4 issue of Virtual Data Center
For many information technologists, virtualizing mission-critical applications remains untrod ground. Fears about application performance, proper backup and recovery, and adequate security for virtual machines (VMs) are among a litany of concerns that have left IT departments slow to warm to virtualization. But a few IT shops have begun to cross the chasm and reap virtualization's benefits by reducing costs, increasing hardware utilization, containing server sprawl and improving disaster recovery practices. For one U.K.-based global heating and plumbing supplies provider that wishes to remain anonymous, the next frontier is virtualizing SAP AG’s enterprise resource planning app, SAP ERP. The global company has sales of more than $31 billion, more than 75,000 employees, some 5,000branches and six data centers in North America and Europe. With a large and complex supply chain that is central to the company’s day-to-day business, virtualizing SAP is a major undertaking. And considering that VMware certified SAP only six months ...
Access this Pro+ Content for Free!
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Features in this issue
Just two years ago, bringing mission-critical applications like SAP into a production environment seemed like a bit of fiction. But today, new hardware offerings and hardware-assisted memory virtualization have made the prospect a reality.
Despite clear benefits and advances in virtualization-related technologies, IT shops remain wary of bringing mission-critical applications into a virtual environment. One global provider of heating and plumbing supplies, however, has embarked on the task of virtualizing SAP
Virtualization brings flexibility and dexterity, enabling rapid change. But change management processes are at odds with that flexibility. How can you reconcile the two?