Requires Free Membership to View
When you register, my team of editors will also send you the latest expert resources covering all areas of server virtualization, such as platforms, architectures and strategies, server hardware, managing virtual environments, application issues and more.
Cathleen A. Gagne, Senior Editorial Director
resources for it. But once users saw what server-side virtual desktop infrastructure could do for them, he had no choice but to move forward.
 |
||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
VDI solved a seemingly simple problem. Users were having a hard time processing and printing out loan packages fast enough. Using a standard-issue desktop, the process took 15 minutes, but the credit union wanted its representatives to process six loan applications per hour.
Barlow isn't a big fan of Microsoft Terminal Services or Citrix Presentation Server, so he wanted to avoid going down that road. Because it runs on top of a Windows operating system, Citrix can't assign much more than 3 GB of system memory to end users, limiting the number of users you can host per system, Barlow explained. And not all applications work well under Citrix. "Citrix always seemed like a kludge to me. You have to make applications work in Citrix – and they don't always."
|  | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Virginia Credit Union was already running VMware ESX Server to host back-end server applications, so Barlow decided to try and encapsulate a standard desktop image in a Windows XP virtual machine (VM) to see how it would perform. To his surprise, the loan printing process decreased from 15 minutes to 45 seconds without requiring any changes to the application.
Why the loan printing process was so much faster with a VDI client isn't perfectly clear. "I think that [the agents] were just too far from the data," Barlow hypothesized. Whatever the case, "once users saw how cool this was, they started demanding it." Barlow said. Thanks to this VDI workaround, the credit union has avoided having to hire two people, he said.Windows VMs ate my networked storage
At first, what prevented Virginia Credit Union from adopting VDI full force was the lack of storage earmarked for VDI. Largely a NetApp shop, the raw capacity to house up to 100 20 GB (or 2 TB) VDI images simply wasn't available.
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
Virginia Credit Union's use of deduplication on primary storage is cutting edge, said Steve Norall, senior analyst with Taneja Group, an analyst firm in Hopkinton, Mass. "In general, the dedupe phenomenon has mainly been relegated to backup and archiving," as exemplified by products from vendors like Data Domain, FalconStor Software and Sepaton. At the same time, a new crop of startups focused on dedupe for primary storage has emerged, Norall said -- companies like Storwize and Ocarina Networks. But deduplicating VDI clients is a great idea, said Tony Asaro, senior analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group in Milford, Mass. "Those images have a lot of duplicate data in them," he said. But NetApp's brand of deduplication is a performance-intensive process that should be scheduled carefully, Asaro said. When it comes to a storage subsystem, "there could be a lot of things going on at once: a RAID rebuild, data replication, etc. Then you throw dedupe on top of it, and you don't know what could happen."
Virginia Credit Union has the luxury of running A-SIS on NetApp's top-of-the-line FAS6070, so performance hasn't been a problem, Barlow reported. "We tweaked the schedule for when it runs a bit, but the box is so powerful that users don't even see a difference."
Let us know what you think about the story; email Alex Barrett, News Director.