Many users wonder why – rather than acquiring a seemingly tangential email company – VMware hasn't chosen to focus on its current technology portfolio. Members of the VMware community on Twitter, for example, questioned why the company isn't focusing more on its existing server and desktop virtualization products. "How about aiming to make [VMware] View better?" kibitzed @Shanetech, the account for ShaneTech Consulting Inc., a New York City virtualization consulting firm. Others on Twitter saw the potential VMware-Zimbra acquisition as reckless. "VMware buying Zimbra would be a mistake; competing with Microsoft, Google, Apple for email servers?" said Steve Foskett, an independent storage consultant. But some observers said the move makes a lot of sense, noting some natural synergies between VMware and Zimbra. Richard McAniff, VMware's newly installed chief development officer and executive vice president, was a longtime Microsoft executive responsible for Microsoft Office. And VMware CEO Paul Maritz, also a Microsoft veteran, showed his propensity for moving up the software stack with the acquisition of SpringSource last summer. Beyond these synergies, acquiring Zimbra -- or a company like it -- is a crucial move for VMware's continued survival, argued Chris Wolf, an analyst at Burton Group. On the Twitter site, he wrote that VMware's business can't always be about running Microsoft applications in virtual machines, and that if VMware can break organizations' dependency on Exchange, they may loosen their dependency on Microsoft. If the VMware-Zimbra acquisition goes through, VMware has plenty of legroom to take on the burden of hosting a large-scale email service, thanks to its enormous data center in Wenatchee, Wash. that was completed this fall.
Senior News Director Barbara Darrow contributed to this report.Let us know what you think about the story; email Alex Barrett, News Director at firstname.lastname@example.org, or follow @aebarrett on twitter.