Requires Free Membership to View
|
||||
Now for the final part of our comparison, a look at additional features. Part one covered the criteria for our evaluation and the administrative features. Part two covered technical specifications and support, and part three covered management and high availability. Part four also contains a wrapup and a list of sources for this article for your reading pleasure.
Additional features
Let's compare our five options on a few more features.
Available physical-to-virtual (P2V) solution
This part checks whether or not an available P2V software package
works with the VMM to transform physical servers into VMs.
|
|
Available physical-to-virtual (P2V) solution |
|---|---|
|
VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 |
Yes |
|
VMware Server |
Yes |
|
Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 |
Yes |
|
Xen 3.0 |
Yes |
|
XenEnterprise |
Yes |
VMware provides a P2V tool, but at cost. Microsoft provides a free one, but it does not P2V Linux. Third-party tools can provide this functionality for Xen 3.0, and XenEnterprise provides this feature, but at cost. Because all of the solutions are pay-for or limited, there is no winner.
Winner(s): --
Loser(s): --
Integrated monitoring solution
Does the VMM comes with an integrated monitoring
solution?
|
|
Integrated monitoring solution |
|---|---|
|
VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 |
Yes |
|
VMware Server |
No |
|
Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 |
No |
|
Xen 3.0 |
No |
|
XenEnterprise |
No |
All of the VMM solutions include integrated monitoring to some extent.
Winner(s): VMware ESX Server 2.5.3, VMware Server, Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2, Xen 3.0, XenEnterprise
Loser(s): --
Integrated backup solution
Let's look at whether or not the VMM comes with an integrated backup solution.
|
|
Integrated backup solution |
|---|---|
|
VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 |
Yes |
|
VMware Server |
No |
|
Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 |
No |
|
Xen 3.0 |
No |
|
XenEnterprise |
No |
VMware ESX 2.5.3 Server provides backup scripts of the box, and for this it scores a point. Backups would not be at all difficult to configure for the other solutions, so they lose points because there is no out-of-the-box backup functionality.
Winner(s): VMware ESX Server 2.5.3
Loser(s): VMware Server, Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2, Xen 3.0, XenEnterprise
Summary
And the wins vs losses stack up like this:
|
|
VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 |
VMware Server |
Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 |
Xen 3.0 |
XenEnterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Administrative |
1 to 1 |
1 to 0 |
1 to 0 |
3 to 0 |
2 to 1 |
|
Technical Specifications |
3 to 3 |
3 to 3 |
3 to 3 |
3 to 2 |
4 to 1 |
|
Support |
3 to 0 |
1 to 0 |
0 to 3 |
2 to 0 |
2 to 0 |
|
Management |
2 to 0 |
2 to 0 |
1 to 0 |
1 to 1 |
3 to 0 |
|
High Availability |
3 to 0 |
2 to 2 |
2 to 2 |
2 to 1 |
2 to 1 |
|
Additional Features |
2 to 0 |
1 to 1 |
1 to 1 |
1 to 1 |
1 to 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
14 to 4 |
10 to 6 |
7 to 9 |
13 to 5 |
14 to 4 |
Winner(s): VMware ESX Server 2.5.3, XenEnterprise
I think what is the most interesting about the results is not that VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 and XenEnterprise tied for the win, but in fact how close Xen 3.0 came to winning. With its community support, Xen 3.0 may end up eclipsing all other virtualization solutions in the not too distant future. Right now, however, I still recommend VMware ESX Server 2.5.3, because VMware has a proven track record when it comes to server virtualization. While XenSource has tremendous industry support, it has not withstood the test of time just yet. But who knows what the next year will bring?
Sources and further information
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 product page
- Xen 3.0 product page
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 and VMware Server - Service level guarantees
- Xen 3.0 - Service level guarantees
- XenEnterprise - Service level guarantees
- VMware Server - Host OS
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 – Host OS
- Xen 3.0 – Host OS
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 – CPU support
- Windows Server 2003 R2 Datacenter x64 Edition - Processor support
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 – System RAM support
- Xen 3.0 – Hardware compatibility
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 – Virtual SMP support
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 – Vendor support
- VMware Server – Vendor support
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 – Vendor support
- Xen 3.0 – Vendor support
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 – Community support
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 – Community support
- Xen 3.0 and Xen Enterprise – Community support
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 and VMware Server – Third-party support (consulting and development)
- Xen 3.0 and Xen Enterprise – Third-party support (consulting and development)
- Xen 3.0 – Web-based server management
- Xen 3.0 – Remote VM console
- Xen 3.0 and Xen Enterprise – Scripting and API support - http://libvir.org/
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 – Template support
- Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 – Template support
- Xen 3.0 and Xen Enterprise – Template support
- Xen 3.0 and Xen Enterprise – VM clustering
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 – Integrated monitoring solution
- VMware ESX Server 2.5.3 – Integrated backup solution
This was first published in May 2006
Virtualization Strategies for the CIO

Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation