How do I choose between vSphere Metro Storage Cluster and VMware Site Recovery Manager?
First, it's important to understand that vSphere Metro Storage Cluster (vMSC) and Site Recovery Manager (SRM) aren't designed to perform the same basic function. Both will help your organization limit downtime, but they work in fundamentally different ways.
VSphere Metro Storage Cluster is a configuration option that allows the use of stretched clusters, where servers within a cluster are spread across geographical locations (usually only a short distance). This configuration allows organizations to perform load balancing and nondisruptive migrations between active data centers.
VMware Site Recovery Manager, on the other hand, takes a traditional disaster recovery approach with primary and backup sites. When a data center outage occurs, SRM enables automated failover to the recovery site with minimal disruption.
The basic difference between the two is disaster avoidance versus disaster recovery. VSphere Metro Storage Cluster will allow you to vMotion workloads between two locations to proactively prevent downtime, while SRM focuses on automating the recovery process of workloads that unexpectedly fail.
Choosing which approach is right for you will depend on your organization's needs. The high availability that vSphere Metro Storage Cluster offers will only help you prevent disruptions you can see coming. However, it allows for near-zero recovery point and recovery time objectives for organizations that cannot tolerate downtime. SRM typically fails over an entire site rather than individual components or VMs and requires slightly longer recovery times. But, it is typically the less-expensive option and allows organizations to automate and test their disaster recovery plans.
Dig Deeper on Disaster recovery, failover and high availability for virtual servers
Related Q&A from Nick Martin
How do containers improve efficiency or consolidation, and do containers on the same host compete with each other for resources? Continue Reading