Good question, one that I wish I had a crystal ball answer for, because the future is fuzzy. Fibre channel seems to be losing its luster: you have TCP/IP networks getting faster (GigE to the desktop); you have network infrastructures that support higher bandwidth applications (video, IPT, etc.); and you need to procure and manage an entire separate networking infrastructure (switches, directors, fibre cabling, etc) to support FC.
Fibre Channel still has a place for storage-intensive applications that you don't want to transact over the IP network, but, from what I'm told, you still have a high-bandwidth network that has a bottleneck (the host) to support storage access.
Dig Deeper on Virtual server backup and storage
Related Q&A from James E. Geis
It's possible to virtualize streaming video, but deployment depends on network, storage I/O, and bandwidth requirements of the virtual host, says an ... Continue Reading
Data deduplication options for virtualized servers might impact performance by creating data bottlenecks, according to an expert. Continue Reading
In a physical-to-virtual migration, getting a handle on your server and storage requirements as well as disaster recovery needs can significantly ... Continue Reading